Public publishing standards
Anslation Editorial Policy
How Anslation plans, writes, reviews, updates, and protects public website content for visitors, search engines, and AI answer systems.
Updated 2026-05-02Anslation Editorial Team
Public articles must match visible public routes and approved company positioning.
Structured data and AI-readable files must reflect what a visitor can actually read on the page.
English-only public copy should stay direct, compact, and easy to cite.
No article should reveal account-only, admin, auth, API, or private product-operation details.
01
Public scope and privacy boundary
Public content should help people understand Anslation without exposing private or operationally restricted paths.
Use only approved public routes, product descriptions, policy pages, and support flows.
Do not publish account-only workflows, admin procedures, or hidden system details.
Keep examples, proof formats, and route summaries safe for open web discovery.
02
Sourcing and factual claims
Claims should stay grounded in visible public pages, approved company copy, or clearly marked templates.
Do not invent customer names, metrics, or private case-study details.
Mark template or future-ready proof structures clearly when real metrics are not public.
Keep route names, next steps, and page purposes accurate to the live website.
03
Updates and freshness
Editorial content should be refreshed when route structures, lane strategy, or public trust pages change.
Use updated dates when the article meaningfully changes.
Refresh linked public routes, keywords, and discovery files after major public route changes.
Prefer fewer strong updates over noisy low-signal edits.
04
Structured data and AI-readable discovery
Metadata, JSON-LD, RSS, topic hubs, and AI-readable files should support the same public story.
Match BlogPosting, FAQ, and page metadata to visible article content.
Keep sitemap, llms.txt, AI JSON, and feed files aligned with canonical routes.
Give AI systems clear summaries, questions, keywords, and source boundaries.
05
AI assistance and human review
AI can help draft, structure, and summarize, but the public result still needs human editorial review.
Review tone, accuracy, and route safety before publishing.
Remove speculative language that suggests hidden product or account capabilities.
Keep the final public page useful for both human readers and machine readers.